Does inclusion equal substance? assessing women's participation in peace processes : 2001-2022

dc.contributor.advisorWielenga, Cori
dc.contributor.coadvisorSokfa, John
dc.contributor.emailmokuenaT65@yahoo.co.uken_US
dc.contributor.postgraduateMokuena, Tselane
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-15T19:37:20Z
dc.date.available2025-02-15T19:37:20Z
dc.date.created2025-04
dc.date.issued2024-10
dc.descriptionDissertation (MA (Diplomatic Studies))--University of Pretoria, 2024.en_US
dc.description.abstractEven though there has been burgeoning literature on women's participation in peacebuilding since the adoption of the United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325, more studies are needed to determine the extent of women's substantive inclusion in peace processes. This study examines how women are included in peace processes in ways that allow them to make a substantive contribution. The study also analyses African conflicts in which women were involved as mediators or in any other substantive way, capturing their participation broadly within the peace processes. A purposive sample of illustrative cases from the continent is selected between 2001, when the UNSCR 1325 was adopted, and 2022, when the study ends. These case studies encompass the following regions: Central, West, the Horn of Africa, North East and East Africa and include the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC,) Central African Republic (CAR,) Liberia, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, and Burundi. The research evaluates women's substantive participation in peace processes using the following criteria: representation, recognition, incorporation, a clear women’s agenda, access, advocacy, and support. The study demonstrates that while including women and engaging in peace processes is critical to ensuring gender equality and sustainable peace, inclusion alone does not always guarantee significant participation. The study interrogates the concepts of inclusion, substantive versus descriptive participation, and formal and informal tracks involving women in peace processes. Keywords: women, participation, inclusion, substantive, descriptive, mediation, Track II, presence.en_US
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden_US
dc.description.degreeMA (Diplomatic Studies)en_US
dc.description.departmentPolitical Sciencesen_US
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Humanitiesen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-05: Gender equalityen_US
dc.identifier.citation*en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.28423985en_US
dc.identifier.otherA2025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/100959
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectUCTDen_US
dc.subjectSubstantive en_US
dc.subjectInclusion
dc.subjectMediation
dc.titleDoes inclusion equal substance? assessing women's participation in peace processes : 2001-2022en_US
dc.typeMini Dissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mokuena_Does_2024.pdf
Size:
5.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Mini Dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: