Definition of meat quality across different cattle breeds

dc.contributor.authorCenci-Goga, Beniamino Terzo
dc.contributor.authorCostanzi, Egidia
dc.contributor.authorBlasi, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorIanni, Federica
dc.contributor.authorTassinari, Marco
dc.contributor.authorTruzzi, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorKarama, Musafiri
dc.contributor.authorEl-Ashram , Saeed
dc.contributor.authorSaraiva, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Barbitta, Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Díez, Juan
dc.contributor.authorZerani, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorGuelfi, Gabriella
dc.contributor.authorMaranesi, Margherita
dc.contributor.authorGrispoldi, Luca
dc.contributor.authorCossignani, Lina
dc.contributor.emailmusafiri.karama@up.ac.za
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-30T05:24:23Z
dc.date.available2026-01-30T05:24:23Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-02
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Data provided to the Journal.
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the impact of cattle breed on key quality attributes—color, marbling, and tenderness—central to consumer choice. Six different bovine breeds were taken into consideration: German Red Pied, Piemontese, Chianina, Angus, Holstein, and a Polish crossbreed. The muscle taken into consideration was the Longissimus thoracis et lumborum. Colorimetric assessments, marbling evaluations, fatty acid profiling, and tenderness measurements were conducted on meat cuts from each breed. The results revealed that Chianina, Holstein, and the Polish crossbreed exhibited distinct color characteristics, with Chianina displaying notably brighter meat. Angus emerged as the most marbled breed, while Chianina and Piemontese showed lower marbling. Total lipid content was correlated with visible marbling. Tenderness assessments identified Angus and Holstein as the most tender breeds. The study’s findings contribute to a proposed grading scale for color, marbling, and tenderness, offering potential labeling infographics to assist consumers in making informed choices based on individual preferences and needs. These insights underscore the importance of breed-specific information on labels to enhance consumer understanding and facilitate more informed purchasing decisions.
dc.description.departmentParaclinical Sciences
dc.description.librarianam2026
dc.description.sdgSDG-02: Zero hunger
dc.description.sponsorshipFunded by the European Union—NextGenerationEU under the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) National Innovation Ecosystem. Università degli Studi di Perugia and MUR supported the Vitality project.
dc.description.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/animals
dc.identifier.citationCenci-Goga, B.T.; Costanzi, E.; Blasi, F.; Ianni, F.; Tassinari, M.; Truzzi, C.; Karama, M.; El-Ashram, S.; Saraiva, C.; Martínez-Barbitta, M.; et al. Definition of Meat Quality Across Different Cattle Breeds. Animals 2025, 15, 3467. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15233467.
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.3390/ani15233467
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/107708
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rights© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
dc.subjectCattle breeds
dc.subjectConsumer choice
dc.subjectLabeling infographics
dc.subjectMeat quality
dc.titleDefinition of meat quality across different cattle breeds
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CenciGoga_Definition_2025.pdf
Size:
614.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: