"Managing less influence with a better understanding : the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field

dc.contributor.authorMahomva, Blessing
dc.contributor.authorBarnard, Helena
dc.contributor.emailbarnardh@gibs.co.za
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-20T07:01:42Z
dc.date.available2025-11-20T07:01:42Z
dc.date.issued2025-05
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE : In international business research, distance connotes unfamiliarity and misunderstanding. This paper aims to theorize the distance between low-income and higher-income countries, taking as point of departure that low-income countries are generally unimportant business partners of high-income countries, but dependent on the goods, services and markets of many of them. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH : Because low-income countries are dependent upon higher income countries, they have a greater incentive to understand high-income countries than the reverse. Higher income countries not only know little about low-income countries, but among themselves also have varied and often competing interests and concerns. This changes how low-income countries, actors with little influence, make sense of distance. The authors use literature on psychic distance and institutional fields to develop this argument. FINDINGS : Rather than managing a series of dyadic distances, low-income countries seek to situate themselves optimally vis-à-vis the range of higher income countries with which they interact. By developing a holistic view of the entire transnational institutional field, they can better navigate and strategically position themselves amongst the more influential high-income countries. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS : This work is conceptual, and the authors recommend future research to empirically test their propositions. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS : This work explains why low-income countries do not necessarily seek aligned interests among higher income counterparts. ORIGINALITY/VALUE : Distance is rarely researched from the perspective of low-income countries. Building on the psychic distance literature, the authors argue that low-income countries have asymmetrically greater motivation and opportunities to overcome distance. This understanding of distance represents a resource for them in conducting business internationally.
dc.description.departmentGordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS)
dc.description.librarianhj2025
dc.description.sdgSDG-17: Partnerships for the goals
dc.description.urihttps://www.emerald.com/cpoib
dc.identifier.citationMahomva, B. & Barnard, H. (2025), "Managing less influence with a better understanding: the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field". Critical Perspectives on International Business, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 517–532, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-08-2024-0087.
dc.identifier.issn1758-6062 (online)
dc.identifier.issn1758-6062 (print)
dc.identifier.other10.1108/cpoib-08-2024-0087
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/105386
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.rights© Blessing Mahomva and Helena Barnard. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence.
dc.subjectLow-income countries
dc.subjectDistance
dc.subjectGlobal economic hierarchy
dc.subjectIssue field
dc.subjectTransnational institutional field
dc.title"Managing less influence with a better understanding : the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mahomva_Managing_2025.pdf
Size:
921.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: