"Managing less influence with a better understanding : the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field
| dc.contributor.author | Mahomva, Blessing | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barnard, Helena | |
| dc.contributor.email | barnardh@gibs.co.za | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-20T07:01:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-20T07:01:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05 | |
| dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE : In international business research, distance connotes unfamiliarity and misunderstanding. This paper aims to theorize the distance between low-income and higher-income countries, taking as point of departure that low-income countries are generally unimportant business partners of high-income countries, but dependent on the goods, services and markets of many of them. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH : Because low-income countries are dependent upon higher income countries, they have a greater incentive to understand high-income countries than the reverse. Higher income countries not only know little about low-income countries, but among themselves also have varied and often competing interests and concerns. This changes how low-income countries, actors with little influence, make sense of distance. The authors use literature on psychic distance and institutional fields to develop this argument. FINDINGS : Rather than managing a series of dyadic distances, low-income countries seek to situate themselves optimally vis-à-vis the range of higher income countries with which they interact. By developing a holistic view of the entire transnational institutional field, they can better navigate and strategically position themselves amongst the more influential high-income countries. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS : This work is conceptual, and the authors recommend future research to empirically test their propositions. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS : This work explains why low-income countries do not necessarily seek aligned interests among higher income counterparts. ORIGINALITY/VALUE : Distance is rarely researched from the perspective of low-income countries. Building on the psychic distance literature, the authors argue that low-income countries have asymmetrically greater motivation and opportunities to overcome distance. This understanding of distance represents a resource for them in conducting business internationally. | |
| dc.description.department | Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) | |
| dc.description.librarian | hj2025 | |
| dc.description.sdg | SDG-17: Partnerships for the goals | |
| dc.description.uri | https://www.emerald.com/cpoib | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Mahomva, B. & Barnard, H. (2025), "Managing less influence with a better understanding: the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field". Critical Perspectives on International Business, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 517–532, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-08-2024-0087. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1758-6062 (online) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1758-6062 (print) | |
| dc.identifier.other | 10.1108/cpoib-08-2024-0087 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/105386 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Emerald | |
| dc.rights | © Blessing Mahomva and Helena Barnard. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. | |
| dc.subject | Low-income countries | |
| dc.subject | Distance | |
| dc.subject | Global economic hierarchy | |
| dc.subject | Issue field | |
| dc.subject | Transnational institutional field | |
| dc.title | "Managing less influence with a better understanding : the benefit for low-income countries of understanding distance as a field | |
| dc.type | Article |
