Document Type Doctoral Thesis Author Neeta, Nande Catherine K email@example.com URN etd-11222006-182223 Document Title Socioculture and students' argument writing in English : a case study from the Vhembe district, Limpopo province, South Africa Degree DLitt (English) Department English Supervisor
Advisor Name Title Prof R Gray Committee Chair Keywords
- Agency in the communication process; argument writ
Date 2006-05-02 Availability unrestricted Abstract
Essay writing is one of the major academic practices that students are expected to master and display. As there is a paucity of information on the nature of sociocultural influence on second language education in the Limpopo Province of South Africa, this study attempts to contribute to knowledge on writing, in general, and on argument writing, in particular in the sociocultural context of the Vhembe District. The central premise for this study is that the way an environment constrains second language learners or frees them to explore and to learn is constituted by sociocultural factors and this includes pedagogical processes. In sociocultural theory, the argument is that to truly understand the human condition, there is a need to analyse and interpret it within the relevant social, cultural and historical context. This is because a learnerís cognitive, language and academic development are strongly influenced by the sociocultural context in which they live and learn and the effect could be either negative or positive. This is because the identity of a learner is constructed in subtle ways that align an individualís aspirations with societal goals. In this alignment, learning is performance based, and it also functions as a self-check mechanism in which written discourse illuminates relations, such as the ones between discourse and value systems, which are transmitted through the education system.
This study attempts to understand and explain second language writing within the Vhembe sociocultural context. Such understanding has emanated from abstractions from experience, the exploration of the literature reviewed for the purpose, and from the evaluation and interpretation of the studentsí engagement in the samples, which have been included in the appendices.
The studentsí performance in writing was taken as an illustration of sociocultural influences. Using document analysis, observations and abstractions, the study found that students are not proficient in writing in general, because of sociocultural parameters, such as collectivism, weak uncertainty avoidance, a restricted code background, a culture of conserving knowledge, lack of discursive interaction, content orientation and first language literacy. Pedagogy also has an influence on competence, because of the way writing is approached in the learning/teaching situations. Learners seem to have a limited capacity in constructing sentences in the correct tense, use of both metadiscourse and cohesive devices.
The study indicates the need to consider learnersí social identity as well as their environment as a way of illustrating the complexity and pertinence of socioculture. This recognition has been given assent through the intervention strategies that are explored and built into the recommendation. The recommendation is that the natural context in which the learners are immersed should be given clarity and should be explored in the English lesson. In this regard, intervention approaches and strategies for learner activities are based on this schema and on collaboration between facilitators of English language learning and content and Mother Tongue facilitators.
Filename Size Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)
28.8 Modem 56K Modem ISDN (64 Kb) ISDN (128 Kb) Higher-speed Access 00front.pdf 47.78 Kb 00:00:13 00:00:06 00:00:05 00:00:02 < 00:00:01 01chapter1.pdf 836.47 Kb 00:03:52 00:01:59 00:01:44 00:00:52 00:00:04 02chapter2.pdf 658.40 Kb 00:03:02 00:01:34 00:01:22 00:00:41 00:00:03 03chapter3.pdf 660.80 Kb 00:03:03 00:01:34 00:01:22 00:00:41 00:00:03 04chapter4.pdf 444.03 Kb 00:02:03 00:01:03 00:00:55 00:00:27 00:00:02 05chapter5.pdf 444.56 Kb 00:02:03 00:01:03 00:00:55 00:00:27 00:00:02 06chapter6.pdf 443.47 Kb 00:02:03 00:01:03 00:00:55 00:00:27 00:00:02 07appendices.pdf 227.29 Kb 00:01:03 00:00:32 00:00:28 00:00:14 00:00:01 08bibliography.pdf 380.97 Kb 00:01:45 00:00:54 00:00:47 00:00:23 00:00:02