Title page for ETD etd-08202011-113850


Document Type Doctoral Thesis
Author De Bruin, David Wegeling
Email dwdebruin@justice.gov.za
URN etd-08202011-113850
Document Title Child participation and representation in legal matters
Degree LLD
Department Private Law
Supervisor
Advisor Name Title
Prof C J Boezaart Supervisor
Keywords
  • views of the child
  • rights of the child
  • legal representation
  • representation
  • participatory right of the child
  • minor
  • guardianship
  • legal capacity
  • infans
  • guardian
  • Children’s Act 38 of 2005
  • child participation
  • capacity to litigate
  • capacity to act
  • birth of the child
  • child
  • best interests of the child
  • age of majority
  • access
Date 2011-04-11
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
The child’s participation in any legal matter involving him/her is crucial whether received directly or indirectly through a legal representative. The significance of the child’s views in legal matters is accepted internationally and is entrenched in South African law. This is the main feature of the present research.

In Roman law the paterfamilias was the complete antithesis of the best interest of the child with his paternal power entirely serving his own interests. The best interests of the child progressively improved his/her participatory rights and the dominance of paternal authority in Roman, Germanic, and Frankish law eventually gave way to parental authority and assistance in Roman-Dutch law. This advanced the child’s participation in legal matters and under Roman-Dutch law, his/her right of participation included legal representation by way of a curator ad litem.

The child’s best interests were consistently viewed from an adult’s perspective and resulted in an adult-centred assessment of his/her best interests. Statutory intervention increased the child’s participatory and representation rights, however, the tenor of these items of legislation remained parent-centred.

The Appeal Court later dispelled any uncertainty regarding the paramountcy with respect to the best interests of the child. During the 1970s in South Africa, the emphasis began shifting from a parent-centred to a child-centred approach in litigation between parents in cases involving their children. An open-ended list of factors comprising the best interests of the child accentuated this shift. Courts were encouraged to apply the paramountcy rule in legal matters concerning children and to consider the views of children in determining their best interests.

The new democratic constitutional dispensation in South Africa, followed by the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the African Charter, obligated South Africa to align children’s rights with international law and standards. The South African Law Reform Commission set out to investigate and to formulate a single comprehensive children’s statute.

The resultant Children’s Act 38 of 2005 is the most important item of legislation for children in private law in South Africa. The Children’s Act provides for the widest possible form of child participation in legal matters involving the child. It revolutionises child participation requiring no lower age limit as a determining factor when allowing the child, able to form a view, to express that view.

The child’s right to access a court and to be assisted in doing so further enhances his/her participatory right. Effective legal representation is the key in ensuring that children enjoy the fundamental right of participation equal to that of adults in legal matters involving children.

Comparative research of child laws in Australia, Kenya, New Zealand and United Kingdom confirms that South Africa is well on the way in enhancing children’s participatory and legal representation rights in legal matters concerning them. This illustrates that only the child’s best interests should serve as a requirement for the legal representation of children in legal matters. Continued training is essential to ensure the implementation of the Children’s Act and requires a concerted effort from all role-players.

© 2010 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.

Please cite as follows:

De Bruin, 2010 Child participation and representation in legal matters, LLD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-08202011-113850 / >

D11/205/ag

Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  00front.pdf 169.06 Kb 00:00:46 00:00:24 00:00:21 00:00:10 < 00:00:01
  01chapters1-2.pdf 348.06 Kb 00:01:36 00:00:49 00:00:43 00:00:21 00:00:01
  02chapter3.pdf 197.31 Kb 00:00:54 00:00:28 00:00:24 00:00:12 00:00:01
  03chapter4.pdf 668.50 Kb 00:03:05 00:01:35 00:01:23 00:00:41 00:00:03
  04chapter5.pdf 938.99 Kb 00:04:20 00:02:14 00:01:57 00:00:58 00:00:05
  05chapter6.pdf 532.77 Kb 00:02:27 00:01:16 00:01:06 00:00:33 00:00:02
  06chapter7.pdf 94.06 Kb 00:00:26 00:00:13 00:00:11 00:00:05 < 00:00:01
  07back.pdf 376.95 Kb 00:01:44 00:00:53 00:00:47 00:00:23 00:00:02

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have more questions or technical problems, please Contact UPeTD.