Title page for ETD etd-05222010-172550


Document Type Doctoral Thesis
Author Mahlo, Salome Mamokone
Email mamokone12@yahoo.com
URN etd-05222010-172550
Document Title Characterization and biological activity of antifungal compounds present in Breonadia salicina (Rubiaceae) leaves
Degree PhD
Department Paraclinical Sciences
Supervisor
Advisor Name Title
Dr L J McGaw Co-Supervisor
Prof J N Eloff Supervisor
Keywords
  • Breonadia salicina
  • fungal pathogens
  • antifungal
Date 2010-04-16
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate plant species to develop a product with the potential of protecting plants or plant products against plant fungal pathogens. Hexane, dichloromethane, acetone, and methanol leaf extracts of six plant species (Bucida buceras, Breonadia salicina, Harpephyllum caffrum, Olinia ventosa, Vangueria infausta and Xylotheca kraussiana) were evaluated for antifungal activity against seven plant fungal pathogens (Aspergillus niger, A. parasiticus, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Penicillium janthinellum, P. expansum, Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium oxysporum). These plant species were selected from more than 400 plant species evaluated in the Phytomedicine Programme that had good activity against two animal fungal pathogens. All the leaf extracts were active against at least one or more of the phytopathogenic fungi in a serial microdilution assay. Of the six plant species, B. buceras had the best antifungal activity against four of the fungi, with MIC values as low as 0.02 mg/ml and 0.08 mg/ml against Penicillium expansum, P. janthinellum, Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium oxysporum.

The number of active compounds in the plant extracts was determined using bioautography with the above-mentioned plant pathogens. No active compounds were observed in some plant extracts against the fungal plant pathogens indicating possible synergism between metabolites responsible for the antifungal activity of the extract. B. salicina and O. ventosa were the most promising plant species, with at least three antifungal compounds.

The antioxidant activities of plant extracts were determined using the qualitative method by spraying TLC chromatograms developed in three eluent systems BEA, CEF and EMW with 1, l-diphenyl -2 picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). The plant extracts of five of these species did not have a strong antioxidant activity. The methanol extract of X. kraussiana was the most active radical scavenger in the DPPH assay amongst the six medicinal plants screened.

Based on good activity against Aspergillus niger and A. parasiticus, leaf extracts of the six plant species were also tested for antifungal activity against A. fumigatus, a very important animal fungal pathogen. The acetone extracts of B. buceras, B. salicina, V. infausta and X. kraussina had good antifungal activity against the animal pathogens, with MIC values ranging between 0.02 and 0.08 mg/ml. This indicates that crude extracts of these species may be more valuable in combating Aspergillus infections in animals than in humans. Based on the results discussed above, B. salicina was selected for in-depth study.

Serial exhaustive extraction was used to extract plant material with solvents of increasing polarities namely, hexane, chloroform, acetone and MeOH. Amongst the four extractants, MeOH extracted the largest quantity of plant material 12.3% (61.5g), followed by acetone 5.6% (27.8 g), hexane 2.6% (12.8 g) and chloroform 2.1% (10.3 g). The chloroform fraction was selected for further work because it had the best antifungal activity against A. niger, C. gloeosporioides, P. janthinellum and T. harzianum and the bioautography assay showed the presence of several antifungal compounds in the chloroform fraction.

Column chromatography was used in a bio-assay guided fractionation and led to isolation of four compounds. The antimicrobial activity was determined against seven plant pathogenic fungi and three bacteria, including the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213) and the Gram-negative Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Pseudomonas aureus (ATCC 27853). The isolated compounds had good antifungal activity against A. parasiticus with an MIC of 10 μg/ml, while in other cases it ranged from 20 to 250 μg/ml. Amongst the four compounds tested, only three had a clear band, indicating that the growth of the pathogenic fungi was inhibited in the bioautography assay.

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and mass spectroscopy (MS) were used for identification of isolated compounds. Only one compound was identified as the triterpenoid ursolic acid. Ursolic acid has been isolated from several plant species and has antifungal activity against Candida albicans (Shai et al. 2008). This is the first report on the isolation of antifungal compounds from leaves of Breonadia salicina. The other compounds isolated appeared to be mixtures of fatty acids based on mass spectroscopy and the structures were not elucidated.

The cytotoxicity of acetone extracts and the four isolated compounds were determined against Vero cells using a tetrazolium-based colorimetric (MTT) assay. The acetone extract was selected based on good in vitro antifungal activity and was used in an in vivo fruit experiment. The acetone extract was less toxic toward the Vero cells with an LC50 of 82 μg/ml than ursolic acid and compound 4 which had LC50 values of 25 and 36 μg/ml respectively. Compounds 2 and 3 had low toxicity against the cells with LC50 values greater than 200 μg/ml.

The potential use of the extract or isolated compound(s) against three plant fungal pathogens Penicillium expansum and P. janthinellum as well as P. digitatum (isolated from infected oranges) were tested after treating the oranges with the extract and ursolic acid. The model used gave good reproducible results. The concentration that inhibited growth correlated reasonably well with MIC values determined by serial microplate dilution. There were substantial differences in the susceptibility of the different isolates tested. The activity of ursolic acid was in the same order as that of the crude acetone leaf extract of B. salicina. The LC50 of the extract varied from 1 to 1.8 mg/ml.

Penicillium digitatum was more resistant to amphotericin B in comparison to other Penicillium species. It has been reported that the fungus was resistant to the three fungicides: sodium -phenylphenate (-phenylphenol), imazalil, and thiabendazole used commercially in the fruit industry to reduce postharvest decay (Holmes and Eckert 1999).

The toxicity of the extract to Vero cells was in the order of 10 times lower than the LC50 of the extracts to the fungal pathogens. Although much work still has to be done, there is good potential that a commercial product can be developed from an acetone leaf extract of B.salicina leaves, especially if the activity of this extract can be improved by removing inactive compounds.

The results confirm the traditional use of B. salicina and demonstrate the potential value of developing biopesticides from plants.

2009 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.

Please cite as follows:

Mahlo, SM 2009, Characterization and biological activity of antifungal compounds present in Breonadia salicina (Rubiaceae) leaves, PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-05222010-172550/ >

D10/337/ag

Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  00front.pdf 105.80 Kb 00:00:29 00:00:15 00:00:13 00:00:06 < 00:00:01
  01chapters1-2.pdf 185.29 Kb 00:00:51 00:00:26 00:00:23 00:00:11 < 00:00:01
  02chapters3-4.pdf 405.14 Kb 00:01:52 00:00:57 00:00:50 00:00:25 00:00:02
  03chapters5-6.pdf 957.40 Kb 00:04:25 00:02:16 00:01:59 00:00:59 00:00:05
  04chapters7-9.pdf 591.29 Kb 00:02:44 00:01:24 00:01:13 00:00:36 00:00:03
  05chapters10-11.pdf 1.33 Mb 00:06:10 00:03:10 00:02:46 00:01:23 00:00:07
  06back.pdf 3.15 Mb 00:14:34 00:07:29 00:06:33 00:03:16 00:00:16

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have more questions or technical problems, please Contact UPeTD.