Beyond [177Lu]Lu-PSMA : a meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of emerging PSMA radioligand therapy agents
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BMC
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of emerging prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) agents used beyond [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were performed from inception until November 3, 2025. Studies reporting objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and/or toxicity outcomes were included. Meta-analytic pooling, assessment of publication bias, heterogeneity analyses, and subgroup evaluations were conducted using Stata software.
RESULTS: A total of 33 studies published between 2017 and 2025 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 3625 therapy cycles administered to 1525 patients. The pooled DCR was 86% (95% CI: 82–90%), and the pooled ORR was 57% (95%CI: 50–63%). [²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA monotherapy, evaluated in 17 studies, achieved pooled DCR and ORR values of 88% and 62%. Eight studies assessing [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu/[²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem therapy reported pooled DCR and ORR values of 84% and 51%. Five studies on [¹⁶¹Tb]Tb-PSMA demonstrated pooled DCR and ORR values of 81% and 46%. [¹³¹I]PSMA therapy, reported in three studies, resulted in a pooled DCR of 75% and pooled ORR of 48%. Adverse events were documented in 32 studies, with a pooled incidence of 26%. Most events were low-grade and reversible. Xerostomia and anemia were the most frequently reported toxicities, with xerostomia particularly associated with [²²⁵Ac] Ac-PSMA–containing regimens.
CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the promising therapeutic potential of emerging PSMA RLT agents beyond [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA, with favorable biochemical responses and manageable safety profiles. Future large-scale prospective studies are essential to define optimal therapeutic roles and expand treatment opportunities for patients with mCRPC.
Description
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION: SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1: Filled PRSIMA Protol checkelist SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2: List of employed MeSH and Emtree terms SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 3: Rationale behind model selection approach implemented in this meta-analysis SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 4: Results of Methodological Quality evaluation by NIH evaluation tool. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 5: Characteristics of included studies. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 6: Detailed Clinical and biochemical adverse events reported following PSMA RLT administration
SUPPORTING INFORMATION: SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1: Filled PRSIMA Protol checkelist SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2: List of employed MeSH and Emtree terms SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 3: Rationale behind model selection approach implemented in this meta-analysis SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 4: Results of Methodological Quality evaluation by NIH evaluation tool. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 5: Characteristics of included studies. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 6: Detailed Clinical and biochemical adverse events reported following PSMA RLT administration
Keywords
PSMA RLT, Prostate cancer (PCa), [²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA, [¹⁶¹Tb]Tb-PSMA, [¹³¹I]PSMA, Tandem therapy, Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), Radioligand therapy (RLT), Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG-03: Good health and well-being
SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Citation
Abdlkadir, A.S., Al-Adhami, D., Moghrabi, S. et al. 2026, ‘Beyond [177Lu]Lu-PSMA: a meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of emerging PSMA radioligand therapy agents’, BMC Cancer, vol. 26, art. 551, pp. 1–13. doi : 10.1186/s12885-026-15900-y.
